Monthly Archives: February 2010

Back From a Desert Island… ROCK SUGAR!

This Saturday I think I don’t want to write about anything… serious. At all. Instead I wanted to point you to the next CD that I’ll be buying for my daughters’ continuing rock education: Rock Sugar’s Reimanginator. I mentioned this yesterday on Twitter, but this is worth a little more time to get the word out. More than 144 characters, at least. If you were musically aware in the 1980′s, you need to clear your busy calendar and spend the next six minutes watching this.

Wow, right? I mean, it’s the very opposite of ground breaking, but still fantastic, in a bacon and chocolate kind of way. Maybe not good for you, but so fun to consume. Note that you can listen to a large part of each song on the CD on their site. Thanks to John Scalzi for the link fun.

Obama, Hayek vs. Keynes, and Of Course, Rap

When the first two stimulus packages were passed, many citizens were nodding their heads, saying to themselves it made sense. At the same time, most of political establishment did the same nodding, egging on the spending. It makes sense, right? Private spending is down, so the Federal Government spends big to cover at least some of the gap, therefore stimulating more spending? Not so fast, though. It’s actually not that obvious, and is hardly settled economic theory. It’s an old argument, too, going back to the first half of the 20th century, notably as a disagreement between the theories of John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich Von Hayek.

So, in the dawn of the second decade of the 21st century, how does one get caught up on these theories? YouTube, of course. A RAP video on YouTube.

Back? Good. Now, two years after the first stimulus under GW Bush, and a year after a much larger version under Obama, how’s the economy going? But don’t worry: they’re getting ready to pass a third one, if they can find the votes (watch for it under the term “jobs bill”). Does this invalidate Keynes’ theories? Maybe, but there’s a good argument to be made that Obama isn’t really following his proscriptions anyway. Money magazine has a great interview laying out this idea.

My opinion is this: as soon as Keynes came out with this spend big theory, politicians everywhere danced, laughed, and danced a bit more. This gave them a scientific excuse to borrow money that we don’t have to spend on pet projects, on what contributors would like pumped up, and on buying votes from eager constituents. It was a license to spend, and spend big, all under the cover of what the experts say should be done. This goes for both parties, so it’s not a partisan thing. So yeah, I’m a big fan of Hayek.

I’ll end with this: it can’t go on forever. It might go on for a long, long time yet, but you can’t keep increasing the national debt at rates like this and not have to pay a terrible price someday.

Public Service Announcement, British Style

The Anchoress over at First Things posted this yesterday, and I wanted to share it. It’s a public service annoucement  from Britain, and an effective one. I showed it to my wife last night, and she was moved. The look on the actors’ faces when things start to go bad is just amazing.

Defining the TEA Party

During my lunch break (it’s raining outside, so no hour long walk for me today), I read two excellent articles talking about how to define the TEA Party. The first one is from Hot Air, and focuses upon the Left’s neurosis regarding this definition:

The Tea Party movement is a political Andromeda Strain to the media, a baffling outbreak of viral unhappiness which has thus far defied every attempt at diagnosis. This is unsurprising, since the media has little interest in listening to what the Tea Party is actually saying. Instead, they attempt to stuff this remarkable grassroots movement into a variety of scary costumes, so they can be conveniently dismissed.

Read the whole thing, because he goes on to show the caricatures the Left creates to make themselves feel better. The second is from BigJouralism, Andrew Breitbart’s new blog. It actually finishes the job, explaining what the TEA Party is all about, in a simple, single sentence:

With that, let me tell you what the Tea Party movement wants. I will make it simple and straightforward and easy for all to understand — I will put it in all CAPS and type slowly:

THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT WANTS AMERICA TO RETURN TO CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES.

Well, yeah, that works. You look at the people involved with the TEA Party, listen to the speeches made at their events, and read the quick interviews with the participants, and that single sentence sums it up pretty well. It’s actually pretty amazing, if you take the Constitution at its word and “be simple” about it, how much the government does that’s obviously unconstitutional. I mean that, too. In allowing the Federal Government to expand to its current rediculous size, the Supreme Court had to ignore and/or explain away key parts of the original Document. In many ways, large sections of the Consitution have been rendered meaningless over the course of the past 200 years. Read the 9th and 10th Amendments, then try to square them with our current reality. You can’t, using any measure of common sense. But, when the ambition of political leaders ran up against them, 9 Justices twisted themselves into pretzels and made it work.

Note to the Left: in a very real way, when attacking the TEA Party, you’re attacking the Founding Fathers, their ideas, and their hopes and dreams, as well.

Newsflash: Commutes Suck

Yeah, speaking the obvious here, I know. I was sitting here, before going to bed, thinking about today and what to write about. I reflected about just how much stuff I got done (don’t worry, I won’t list it off, since it’s mostly pretty mundane, every day things), considering it’s a work day. Then I thought of the big reveal for the day: commutes suck. Why? The reason I got all these things done and still had time to watch some TV before sitting in front of the computer is because I worked from home today. Since I drop the toddler and the wife off at their respect day time haunts on my way to work, I spend nearly two hours a day in the car. Today: zero.

It’s a rare thing for me, unfortuately. I have a software job, so theoretically it’s possible, but the pipes are just too small from here to my work (their side, not mine, really), so it’s just too inefficient. Anyway, I really look forward to the day where my commute is at or near zero minutes — every day. It’s coming, but not for a long while.

Good News for IPA Drinkers

Now, I like IPA (India pale ale, which is a light, extremely hoppy type of beer, for the non-beer drinkers reading this), but I’m more of a porter or stout kind of beer drinker. I have some friends that are much bigger IPA fans than me, though, so this news should make them pretty happy:

A beer a day could keep brittle bones at bay. That’s because beer is rich in silicon, an element that has been linked to bone health. But what type of beer should you drink?

Previous studies have shown that silicon can aid bone growth, and that moderate beer drinking is linked to increased bone density. Now Charles Bamforth and Troy Casey at the University of California, Davis, have discovered how much silicon each type of beer contains.

They analysed 100 beers from around the world and found that the brews contained between 6.4 and 56 milligrams of silicon per litre, with an average of 29 milligrams per litre. Looking at the silicon levels in beer’s ingredients, they found that most of it comes from the husks of malted barley.

The pair found that lighter-coloured beers made from pale malted barley and hops, such as pale ales, are richest in silicon, while low-alcohol beers contain the least, along with stouts, porters and wheat beers.

Maybe I’ll up my light/dark ratio a bit. You know, for my health. You can never start too early to keep your bones nice and strong! Thanks to Instapundit for the news filtering for the day.

Creepy Audi Super Bowl Commercial

This year’s crop of hyper-expensive Super Bowl commercials was, in this blogger’s opinion, a little underwhelming. A few stood out on the plus side, but man, did one stand out on the minus: the “green” Audi commercial. Yes, I know it was some sort of satire and meant to be taken with tongue firmly in cheek. Still, I just don’t get the impression that the maker’s of this piece of alt-history really got how scary this would be. They offer up this eco-totalitarian world where you can be arrested for all sorts of ridiculous things, but wait! Here’s your way out! The diesel Audi! Is the scenario impossible? Probably, but I’m positive that there are a small minority of people watching it that are nodding inwardly saying, “Well, of course we wouldn’t go through people’s garbage, but really, there oughta be a law about (fill in the blank eco-faux pas)”.

Anyway, watch for yourself. Am I just not seeing the humor in it? Does this help or hurt Audi’s brand?

[Update: 2/8/2010] Jim Geraghty noticed the same issues, and ties it in with Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism.

Charo!

Thank you Wil Wheaton. This will never leave my soul. As to if that’s a good thing, click through, and you be the judge.

Interview with Burt Rutan at the New Scientist

Burt Rutan is a genius, and happens to be one of my Dad’s heroes (he’s built, worked on, and flown planes from his designs for a couple decades). I’ve posted about him before. He’s the guy behind lots of the most inventive aircraft ever built — that actually worked, that is. The Veri-EZ and Long-EZ, one of the most used home-built designs ever, are his. So is the Voyager, the plan that flew around the world on one tank of gas. Finally, he won the X-Prize, and his company, Scaled Composites, is the main designer behind Virgin Galactic. Cool stuff. A legend.

He’s also an outspoken and passionate voice against the “climate change” crowd. I read this recent interview published by the British magazine the New Scientist with him, and had to share it. It’s a quick article, but gives a nice insight into the guy. I thought it was interesting that he flat out won’t do interviews with Scientific American, due to their reporting of global warming / climate change. He’s definitely a man of strong opinions!

Hidden Mickey Pins? Really?

I had no idea. Anyone that’s been to a Disney park has probably noticed all those pins that people wear on lanyards, and for sale in the shops. What I didn’t know is there are special ones: hidden Mickey pins. Apparently you can only get these pins by trading other ones with cast members. Man, Disney is good. That really has to be almost irresistable to obsessive collectors that live near the parks, or visit regularly. Luckily, I’m not obsessive.

(My wife arches her eyebrow in my direction.)

OK, at least I don’t live near the parks. Honestly, though, after reading this post on the Disney Parks Blog, it’s pretty neat. There’s so much back story to, well, everything that Disney does. Layers upon layers.