Monthly Archives: February 2010

Friday Fun: 14 Year Old Onion Article

It’s Friday, so I’m going to hold off posting anything that requires thought. Well, deep thought, anyway. After 14+ years of reading The Onion (America’s Finest News Source), this remains my favorite article: Immigration Officials Beef Up U.S.-Mexican Border With Pure Beef. And this was over a decade before President Bush tried to push comprehensive immigration reform! The Onion had it solved — all they had to do is look in the right place.

As usual, read the whole thing. Believe me, it’s worth it:

EL PASO, TX—In an effort to beef up security measures along the U.S.-Mexican border, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service announced Monday that the border will soon be fortified with 1,200 miles of pure beef.

Keep reading…

What’s Real and What’s Not?

Find yourself 4 minutes and watch the video below, from Stargate Studios. My jaw was dropping watching this. It was found via The Anchoress, that remarked that “this video made her sad”. Don’t worry, though — even though I get where’s she’s coming from, I think it causes surprise more than sadness.

So here’s the sadness part: in the past, I thought I could tell what was “real” and what was not on TV shows. It was either stuff that didn’t look real (Shrek) or stuff that was obviously too expensive to do in real life (scenes of major natural disaster). Now? Not so much. So, when do you think they’ll start doing this with people? 10 years? 15?

Getting in Trouble with Your Camera Phone

This story plays into every new Dad’s nightmares: how can I prove this kid is really mine? Well, maybe not every new Dad has this thought, but I remember reading about it when Daughter the Younger was just born. You think about being out with just your kid, and something comes up (that part’s never filled in), and suddenly you’re expected to prove the kid is yours. Not easy. It’s not like I carry around her birth certificate everywhere I go!

So this poor guy takes a snapshot of his son on a mall ride, and boom, he’s being accused of being a perv. I’m glad the guy stood up for himself, and I hope the security guard — at least — gets a good teachin’ about how taking pictures of your kid isn’t weird or dangerous. There’s a difference between some guy sitting all by himself in the park for extended periods of time taking photos of kids that obviously aren’t his and taking a snapshot of one particular kid you’re interacting with. Common sense should be a pretty easy indicator for right and wrong here.

Authority figures in both the United States and Great Britain — but especially Britain — has been progressively been getting more and more touchy with photo taking during this past decade. I think it’s part due to terrorist threats and the stress of living in a creeping panopticon type society that’s tweaking people out. Probably the worst trend in the States has been police trying to stop citizens from taking photographs of them doing their job in public. Instapundit has done a good job of tracking this trend. It’s flat out dangerous. (Who watches the watchers, and all that.) In a creeping surveillance society, it’s actually MORE important that authority itself gets surveilled more aggressively by the public.

Pass the Salt, Please?

It seems every day the medical establishment is telling us something different about what we should or shouldn’t do regarding our health. Usually its just refinements, and not wholesale changes in the message. Once in a while, though, everything changes. How many times have you heard that a low salt diet is good for you? Have you ever chosen the low sodium option in the supermarket, because it’s “better”? I hate to break it to you, but the science is most emphatically not in:

That’s the beauty of the salt debate: there’s so little reliable evidence that you can imagine just about any outcome. For all the talk about the growing menace of sodium in packaged foods, experts aren’t even sure that Americans today are eating more salt than they used to.

The experts don’t have anything approaching a consensus regarding how much of the tasty stuff we’re supposed to take in. Pretty soon, they’ll be saying butter isn’t bad for you. (And bacon!) Good reporting from the New York Times, as they’re not pushing a particular view here. Read the whole thing.

The funny thing is back in the 90′s, there was as show called Crusade. It takes place a couple hundred years in the future. A character on the show is sitting down to eat a meal, and is putting a bunch of salt on their food, and says, “Do you realize that people in the 20th century used to think salt was bad for you?” That quote might go down as the most portentous line in the whole 13 episode series.

Julie & Julia: the Great and Not So Great

My wife and I sat down to the first adult movie we’ve seen in a while last night: Julie & Julia. It’s a year old now, so this isn’t breaking news, but this is how things go when you have kids. Slowly. So, first the good: Meryl Streep is fantastic as Julia Child. I’m not up on all the Oscar movies, but if she won Best Actress, it would be deserved. On the screen, she’s truly a force to be reckoned with. The picture also did a great job of advertising just how wonderful good French cooking can be, with all its decadent and wonderful components. Butter and cream! Sans tarder!

Now, the not so great. OK, so honestly, the Republican bashing wasn’t just annoying, it was weird. In one part of the story, her boss is chewing her out for (he believes) calling in sick just to blog. Out of the blue, he says, “Anyone else would fire you. A Republican would fire you!” OK, weird. It didn’t make me mad, really, but it did take me and my wife completely out of the story for a minute. There’s also a sub-plot with Julia’s husband being recalled to Washington, D.C. for some Senator McCarthy hearings. Now, I have no idea if this story was in the original Child book about her time in France — maybe — but it felt contrived. Hollywood really does have a psychological problem with the McCarthy hearings, in that they just cannot put it behind them. Guys, it was almost 60 years ago. It would be like Hollywood of the 50′s reminding you time and time again about the poor way the Anarchists were treated in the 1890′s. That would be bizarre too, don’t you think?

Bob’s Red Mill is Now Employee Owned

Wow. I love Bob’s Red Mill. My wife and I shop at the company store every chance we get. They sell great quality grains, legumes, among other types of food, and in bulk, if you want it. I just had some of their 13 bean soup mix on Ash Wednesday, actually. The employees there have always been top notch and very helpful to us. All this is a backdrop for the bombshell that was dropped today: Bob Moore — the founder and owner of the company — is giving the entire works to his employees. Considering they only have 209 employees, this is a big, big deal:

“This is Bob taking care of us,” said Lori Sobelson, who helps run the business’ retail operation. “He expects a lot out of us, but really gives us the world in return.” Moore declined to say how much he thinks the company is worth. In 2004, however, one business publication estimated that year’s revenues at more than $24 million. A company news release issued this week stated that Bob’s Red Mill has chalked up an annual growth rate of between 20 percent to 30 percent every year since.

Wow. As an employee of a privately-held company, you really can’t expect this. You make an agreement to do your job at the best of your ability for an agreed upon package, mostly being salary. No complaints there, but this is pretty much a dream for these workers. Instead of only the executives getting the package, they’re all getting it. Neat.

We’ll find out now, I guess, how much of their success had to do with Bob Moore himself, and his company can keep succeeding so wildly at what they do. I know I’ll keep spending my cash there (from another privately held company, by the way).

Here’s a video about it on ABC News that, unfortunately, I’m unable to embed.

The Catholic Church and Immigration

I read this article in the Portland Archdiocese’s newspaper, Catholic Sentinel, yesterday, and it brought back some old thoughts that I’ve struggled with over the years. The Catholic Church, at least in the United States, was very much for the “comprehensive immigration reform” effort from a couple years ago. I’ve never really understood how this issue got so polarized, and forgive me, stupid. Here’s an idea: close the borders down as tight as you can and start really clamping down on illegal immigrants (yes, they’re illegal — stop with the Orwellian nonsense of “undocumented”). On the other side of things, stream line the process of getting admitted to this country so it doesn’t take years to get in, but only months, and bump the amount allowed legally by a factor of 10. Don’t let felons in the country, or anyone with known connections to terrorist groups. There, done.

That plan doesn’t make either side happy, though. On one, you have people that honestly believe immigrants steal jobs from Americans. Ignorance. On the other, you have people that really want open borders, and damn the consequences. Felons skipping country? No problem! Terrorists? No problem! All I want to know is WHO is actually coming to live in my neighborhood.

This is covered ground on this blog, but what I never got was why the Catholic Church so fervently takes the later, open borders side of things. It’s just strange.

54 Billion More Borrowed From Our Kids

Yesterday, President Obama announced a new gambit to get Republicans closer to getting on board with the cap and trade scam — I mean, scheme — that he desperately wants to pass during his administration. He is now promising guaranteed loans to industry for the building of the first new nuclear power plants in around 30 years in the United States.

If I blur my eyes enough, this is a darn good thing. It’s inexcusable that with all the problems that the requirement for fossil fuels cause we still have “environmental” concerns about this tech. Anyone that won’t even consider nuclear power plants in the year 2010 is subscribing more to a religion than common sense. So, yeah, good on Obama, right?

Well, no, I don’t think so. The biggest problem that citizens have right now with our government is the catastrophic spending binge we’ve been on. It’s been a problem throughout the last decade, but has reached truly stupid levels in the past year. Given that, take a gander at this paragraph from the above-linked article:

According to the official, Obama’s 2011 budget “triples loan guarantees for nuclear-power plants to more than 54 billion dollars.”

This is a good thing? Really? So, we’re spending 54 billion of borrowed money to loan to private industry at great interest rates. News flash: this is a bad thing, not a good thing. My question is this: why the need for government loans? Is the price of generating electricity via nuclear power really more expensive than via coal, oil, or natural gas? If it is, why? Is it due to insurance costs? Excessive regulation? Waste disposal? The cost of the fuel? That should be the answer: attack the problem from those angles, and not go to our grandchildren for the money to finance our projects.

Republicans need to see this for what is is: the administration borrowing from the future to buy them off for votes for the tax and control scam cap and trade represents. I’m all for the industry building out our non-fossil fuel capacity. The government has no business greasing the skids — especially when the deficit is so ridiculous.

Thanks to Instapundit for the link above, even though we’re on different sides on this one (rare, but it happens).

More Excuses to Eat Chocolate and Drink Wine

Boing Boing has a report from this year’s TED conference (Technology, Entertainment, Design), and the first thing highlighted is work on anti-angiogenic foods and their affect on cancers. Basically, these are foods that discourage the creation of new blood vessels, thereby starving some type of tumors before they can become problematic. Check out the list. While I’m sure most people will find a few of these things that they’re not excited about, generally, this is a great list for people wanting to mesh good for you with good tasting. Dark chocolate = good. Olive oil = good. Red wine = good. Those are the classics everyone knows are good for their anti-cancer properties. While a lot of Mediterranean food is on this list, so are foods that grow great around the Pacific Northwest. Strawberries, apples, blueberries, pumpkins, and cherries… all local and all kickin’ cancer while its down.

This makes me want to go and plant some of these berries and fruits this weekend. Something I’ve been planning on doing for the past week or two, but keep putting it off.

Earth Abides: My Review

Last week, I finished listening to a book recommended to me as one of the greatest sci-fi books ever: George R. Stewart’s Earth Abides. I say listened, since this was the Audible version of the book, and not the reading version of the book. And yeah, I hate when people refer to listening to a book as “reading”. Confusing!

The story is told from the point of view of one character, named Isherwood Williams, or Ish, and takes place in the last 1940′s. The world has been hit by a virus that dwarfs anything that’s come before, killing 99.9999% of the population. I’m not giving anything away here, since is given up literally in the first page of the book. Only a very small handful of humans are left to roam the world.

First, the good. The book is half-way an intellectual study of how ecologically the Earth would be affected by such a massive and abrupt depopulation. How long do the works of Man remain? How are other creatures affected by our departure? What isn’t affected? If this was the only thrust of the book, while it might be a bit boring, it would also be enjoyable and interesting to some extent. The Earth itself becomes the main character in this case, while the human becomes the passive viewer.

Now the bad part of the book. The author also decided that he would take a stab at what would happen to humanity in these trials, and how civilization would perform and, perhaps, survive. While I won’t give away the ending, let’s just say that unless it’s a complete red herring — and I don’t think it is — the author isn’t very hopeful that such small numbers of humans left would be sufficient. Probably most annoying is the main character, Ish. I believe him to represent the very worst of the intellectual, technocratic thread that ran through Western Civilization during the first half of the 20th century, peaking during the early parts of the FDR administration. To these arrogant “smart” people, most of the population are illiterate, simple, dull creatures that need to be led by the hand to the “right” paths. Only very, very few people have the capacity to plan or to see beyond the end of their nose. So, therefore, the biggest problem with the almost-complete destruction of the human race is that there’s so few of the intellectuals left. Oh, there’s the cattle, but if you believe the main character, out of 20+ kids, only a single one had the capability to learn to read. “If only more people were like himself!”, the Ish moans.

Blather. To believe this nonsense, you’d have to believe that to read, you’d need to have an IQ of 140+, assuming 100 is the average. This is obviously not true, and the only way someone could possibly believe that is if they live in a self-contained bubble of their family and academia where they believe themselves to only be in the presence of the gifted class. Disgusting. It sounds plausible if you only give it a few seconds thought: the world’s problems are caused by the sub-intelligent, careless, and evil of the world, and if we only gave the reins over to the good, enlightened experts, we’d be saved! Unfortunately for this viewpoint, most of the world’s problems are caused by the experts.

So, no, I can’t really recommend this book. By all means, though, go to the Amazon page linked to above and read the reviews. I’m certainly in the minority with this opinion.